Ethical revision guide

How to reduce similarity ethically

The strongest revision improves the clarity and originality of your thinking—it does not disguise copied wording.

Start with the reason for the match

When a report highlights a passage, first identify what it is. It may be a correctly quoted source, a reference entry, a common phrase, a required template, or a section that is too close to someone else's wording. The right response depends on that context—not on the percentage alone.

Four sound ways to improve a draft

1. Quote direct language accurately

When the exact wording is important, use quotation marks or your required block-quote format and provide a complete citation. Do not lightly rewrite a distinctive sentence merely to avoid a match.

2. Paraphrase from understanding

Read the source, make notes, then explain the idea in a different structure and in your own academic voice. A synonym swap is not genuine paraphrasing. Cite the original source even when the wording is entirely yours.

3. Add your own analysis

Explain why the evidence matters to your argument. Compare authors, assess limitations, connect theory to your data, or state your reasoned conclusion. This is where academic work becomes yours.

4. Keep a careful source trail

Maintain a reference manager or research notes while drafting. It is much easier to cite correctly as you write than to reconstruct sources at the end of a long project.

Shortcuts to avoid

Need help? If you are unsure whether a match is acceptable, your lecturer, supervisor, writing centre, or department academic-integrity office is the right place to ask.

Use a report to guide meaningful revision

Check a working draft, review each source match, and leave time for careful improvements.

Check my document

Further reading

Turnitin’s student materials describe similarity information as support for improving writing and source use. Read the student guide.